Sports Hub
Ligue-1

Supporters praise Ligue 1 referee for outlining a controversial determination on live TV 

Supporters praise Ligue 1 referee for outlining a controversial determination on live TV 

Ligue 1 referee is praised for telling enthusiasts accurately why he transformed his determination to make it possible for Nantes’ remarkable equaliser at Troyes in a post-match Tv job interview… right after to begin with ruling it out for a handball

Nantes drew with Troyes immediately after their late equaliser was presented next a reviewReferee Jeremie Pignard gave a television interview to make clear the decisionFans have praised the openness of the formal in revealing his thought process 

Fans have praised French referee Jeremie Pignard for conveying his choice to permit Nantes late equaliser to stand against Troyes on are living television, just after in the beginning ruling out the target for handball.

French forward Evann Guessand scored a spectacular equaliser in the sixth moment of damage time to earn Nantes a 2-2 draw, obtaining fallen at the rear of to Troyes just 4 minutes before.

The draw saved Nantes out of the relegation zone on goal variance in Ligue 1. 

Pignard initially dominated out the goal just after ruling that Guessand’s crew-mate Mostafa Mohamed experienced managed in the make-up.

The referee was identified as around to overview the choice soon after session with the VAR formal, with Pignard in the end choosing to award the objective.

Referee Jeremie Pignard had initially disallowed Nantes late equaliser due to a handball

Referee Jeremie Pignard had to begin with disallowed Nantes late equaliser because of to a handball

The official later awarded the goal after reviewing the goal in consultation with VAR

The official later awarded the aim following reviewing the objective in session with VAR

Pignard spelled out on Amazon Primary he had authorized the goal to stand right after examining wherever the ball experienced struck Mohamed, with the Nantes’ player regarded to have manufactured a organic motion when leaping to challenge the defender.

He additional that Troyes manager Patrick Kisnorbo recognized his determination after hearing his explanation. 

‘This objective would have been disallowed if the scorer would have been the individual who touched the ball with his arm. That is the initially thing to choose into account,’ Pignard reported.

‘We see that in this predicament his group-mate is the just one who scorers, so we already overlook this rule. Now it is required to know if the hand if the participant who controls the ball is sanctionable or not.

‘I do not know ideal away and currently being in question, I enable the action unfold until finally the conclusion, whereas if I had whistled straight absent we would have skipped that aim.

‘Now VAR arrives into perform and he must come to a decision whether for him at the amount of the legal guidelines of the video game regardless of whether this hand is punishable or not. It is really from the base of the biceps it is not okay.

‘You can see why I took my time mainly because it was an critical choice and VAR did well to send out me so I could see the picture, and I then stated to the mentor and he finished up knowledge the regulations that this ball evidently touches the player’s sleeve.

‘So it is a pure motion, we are not there to penalise the players and check with them to leap with their arms guiding their backs.’

Pignard gave a live television interview with Prime Video to explain why the goal was awarded

Pignard gave a are living television job interview with Prime Video to describe why the goal was awarded

The referee said Troyes manager Patrick Kisnorbo accepted his explanation to give the goal

The referee reported Troyes manager Patrick Kisnorbo accepted his rationalization to give the intention

Pignard’s clarification gained praise from enthusiasts, with the openness of the official coming days right after his fellow referee Benoit Millot was mic’d up for a French Cup tie. 

‘Besides regardless of whether he is appropriate or incorrect, the initiative to give the floor to the referees is good,’ 1 lover stated.

A further included ‘I discover it fascinating to have the referee’s explanations, it offers indicating to the recreation and to their selections.

‘It is very very good to have their explanations of the guidelines by Jeremie Pignard. I imagine refereeing selections on fragile circumstances will be improved comprehended and better approved,’ a third stated, with a different commeting ‘Excellent explanation that lets you to settle for.’

The perception arrives as PGMOL main refereeing officer Howard Webb has reportedly exposed new strategies for referees to clarify their choices to admirers for the duration of and following Leading League games.

Just one place that has been talked about at excellent size this period is how VAR is employed, with admirers usually becoming remaining in the dim about the conclusion procedure that officers are earning.

Related posts

PSG 1-3 Lorient: People pull off shock victory as Hakimi sent off and Mbappe intention not plenty of

admin

French football fans MOON opposition penalty taker in hilarious try to set him off his place kick

admin

Tottenham ‘open talks’ with Football Supervisor revelation Will Even now as successor to Antonio Conte

admin